AIM by SkyHaven Group
Companies Quadrant Trends Compare Scoring method
Search companies SkyHaven
Menu
Companies Quadrant Trends Compare Scoring method Search companies SkyHaven Group

Trend intelligence

Trends

Governance-heavy, proof-light.

Risk & Governance carries the widest public surface, while the highest readiness proof is concentrated in Systems & Infrastructure. The interesting trend is not simple adoption; it is the gap between AI language, filed disclosure, and operating evidence.

Dominant pattern 60% Risk & Governance
Proof pocket 80 Systems & Infrastructure avg score
Filing gap +30 AEM
Weakest lane 5.6 Capital Allocation

Trend constellation

Where the cohort is actually moving

Lower signal Higher signal
Higher readiness Strategic signal

Risk & Governance

Governance is the loudest public AI language.

This is the gravity well: most companies disclose AI through risk control, policy, and governance language before they prove operating leverage.

Share
60%
Score
56
Signal
5.9
Evidence
100%
Filing gap
+16

Average score 56 with 5.9 signal and 100% evidence density; signal and score are moving together; research is ahead of filings by +16 points.

NOW ServiceNow, Inc. NXDT Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

Pressure signals

The trends worth arguing about

These are not category labels. They are measurable gaps in the current AIM read.

Signal outruns score

Heat before proof

These reads show strategic temperature ahead of the composite AIM score. They are worth tracking because the market story is moving faster than the verified proof base.

Largest signal gap +18.0 93 reads run hotter than their score
META Meta Platforms, Inc.

8.5 signal / 67 score

+18.0
DPZ Dominos Pizza Inc

8.6 signal / 71 score

+14.8
SKM Sk Telecom Co Ltd

8.5 signal / 71 score

+14.0
KOF Coca Cola Femsa Sab De Cv

5.4 signal / 41 score

+13.4
FDX Fedex Corp

8.5 signal / 72 score

+12.6
BALL BALL Corp

7.6 signal / 63 score

+12.6

Score outruns signal

Proof without heat

These companies have stronger current proof than their strategic signal implies. That can mark under-narrated operators rather than weak AI positions.

Largest proof gap +17.6 13 reads have proof ahead of signal
EMR Emerson Electric Co

35 score / 1.7 signal

+17.6
CARR CARRIER GLOBAL Corp

39 score / 2.8 signal

+11.4
NOC Northrop Grumman Corp /DE/

41 score / 3.3 signal

+8.2
GEV GE Vernova Inc.

43 score / 3.5 signal

+8.0
AAPL Apple Inc.

39 score / 3.2 signal

+6.6
COP Conocophillips

50 score / 4.5 signal

+5.2

Disclosure lag

Research ahead of filings

Research reads are seeing more than SEC disclosure confirms. This is the watchlist for claims that need sharper filed evidence.

Largest filing gap +30 104 reads show a positive gap
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd

61 research / 31 SEC

+30
NXDT Nexpoint Diversified Real Estate Trust

75 research / 46 SEC

+29
FOXA Fox Corp

55 research / 27 SEC

+28
DPZ Dominos Pizza Inc

84 research / 58 SEC

+26
CCEP COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS plc

71 research / 45 SEC

+26
DEO Diageo plc

57 research / 31 SEC

+26

Weakest capability lane

Underwritten conviction

Capital Allocation is the lowest aggregate lane. The trend page should treat that as a proof demand, not a footnote.

Weakest lane strength 5.6 Capital Allocation
CARR CARRIER GLOBAL Corp

no_supporting_context

0.0
EMR Emerson Electric Co

no_supporting_context

0.0
GEV GE Vernova Inc.

no_supporting_context

0.4
NOC Northrop Grumman Corp /DE/

no_supporting_context

1.0
AAPL Apple Inc.

no_supporting_context

1.0
NTR Nutrien Ltd.

Supporting context does not actually evidence AI capital commitment - the AlphaSpread IR page cited is a generic in...

1.3

Lane strength

What supports the trend read

Capability lanes convert the trend story into proof, confidence, and disclosure quality.

106 reads

Risk & Governance

Strength
8.1
Confidence
66
Disclosure
7.3

3.8 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Talent & Organization

Strength
7.1
Confidence
62
Disclosure
5.4

3.9 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Ecosystem Influence

Strength
6.8
Confidence
61
Disclosure
5.4

3.4 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Strategic Intent

Strength
6.7
Confidence
65
Disclosure
4.8

3.1 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Operational Integration

Strength
6.5
Confidence
66
Disclosure
5.0

3.3 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Market Validation & Outcomes

Strength
6.4
Confidence
64
Disclosure
5.1

3.3 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Innovation & IP

Strength
6.1
Confidence
60
Disclosure
4.5

2.8 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Systems & Infrastructure

Strength
6.0
Confidence
63
Disclosure
4.1

3.8 open unknowns on average

106 reads

Capital Allocation

Strength
5.6
Confidence
60
Disclosure
3.7

3.2 open unknowns on average

SkyHaven Group

AIM is a structured benchmark of public-company AI readiness.

Companies Quadrant Trends Compare Scoring method SkyHaven Group Logos provided by Logo.dev

Copyright SkyHaven Group / Restricted distribution